The honest answer to "should I buy right now" isn't yes or no. It's a set of calculations that depend on your income, your market, your down payment, and how long you plan to stay. What we can do is give you the national numbers as a baseline and show you where the math works and where it doesn't. Nobody benefits from cheerleading a decision that doesn't actually make sense for your situation.

Here's the state of play in May 2026. The national median home price is approximately $414,900 (NAR, Q4 2025). The 30-year fixed mortgage rate is 6.36% (Freddie Mac PMMS, May 14, 2026). The median household income is approximately $81,604 (US Census Bureau). Those three numbers, combined, tell most of the story.

Get this in your inbox every Friday.

The numbers that matter for buyers. Plain English. Free.

The affordability picture at the national level

The US home-price-to-income ratio currently sits at 5.08, according to analysis by Best Interest Financial using the latest Census and NAR data. The historical norm, going back to the post-war era, is closer to 3 to 3.5 times income. Financial planning guidelines typically suggest a maximum of 2.6 times annual income for a home purchase. At 5.08, US housing is deeply unaffordable by any historical standard.

That ratio matters because it sets the floor for the monthly payment problem. Take a median-income buyer earning $81,604, roughly $6,800 a month gross. With 10% down on a $414,900 home, they'd borrow approximately $373,410. At 6.36%, the monthly principal and interest is roughly $2,330. Add a median property tax contribution of around $450 a month, homeowners insurance of approximately $150 a month, and the total PITI approaches $2,930. That's 43% of gross monthly income, well above the 28% guideline that lenders traditionally used to qualify borrowers.

Lenders have moved that limit in practice. Many conventional loans allow debt-to-income ratios up to 45% or 50% with compensating factors (strong credit, reserves). Getting approved and being in a comfortable financial position aren't always the same thing.

Where the national average misleads

Averages hide enormous geographic variation. In Pittsburgh, the median home costs around $237,400, roughly 3x the local median income. In San Jose, the median home tops $1.9 million against a median income of $164,000, a ratio above 11. The national 5.08 figure is a blend of genuinely affordable markets and genuinely broken ones.

If you're buying in a mid-tier Midwest or Southeast market with a household income above the local median, the math may work comfortably. If you're buying in coastal California, the Pacific Northwest, or South Florida at median local incomes, the numbers are unlikely to work without either exceptional income, significant outside capital, or an extended ownership timeline to let appreciation build equity.

Use the market explorer to look at median prices in your target city alongside local market conditions. The rent vs buy calculator will model the breakeven year for your specific inputs.

The 5-7 year rule and why it matters

Buying and selling a home is expensive. Transaction costs, agent commissions, closing costs, title insurance, transfer taxes, typically run 8% to 10% of the purchase price combined (buying and selling). On a $414,900 home, that's $33,000 to $41,000 in frictional costs that need to be recovered through appreciation and equity building before you break even versus renting.

That recovery typically takes five to seven years in a normal market. Hold for less than that and there's a meaningful risk that you'd have been better off renting and investing the down payment. This is the most underappreciated risk in home-buying: not that prices will fall, but that you'll move too soon to recoup the entry and exit costs.

If your job, your relationship, or your life circumstances mean you might move in three years, the rent-vs-buy calculus almost always favours renting. No one likes to hear this because the cultural script says buying is always better than renting. The numbers don't support that as a universal rule.

The conditions that tip the balance toward buying

Despite the affordability headwinds, there are genuine arguments for buying right now in the right circumstances. Rates are lower than they were in 2023 and 2024. In some markets (Austin, Phoenix, parts of Florida) prices have come off their pandemic peaks by 10 to 20%, giving buyers a materially better entry point than two years ago. Inventory is rising in many metros, creating more options and more negotiating room than buyers have seen since 2019.

Rents have also risen sharply since 2020. In many cities, the gap between a monthly mortgage payment and a monthly rent for a comparable property has narrowed. When you can own for a similar monthly cost as renting (and build equity rather than paying a landlord) the holding-period math changes in favour of ownership faster.

The factors that most consistently point toward buying rather than continuing to rent are: a stable employment situation with reliable income, a planned stay of at least five to seven years, total housing costs at or below 30 to 35% of gross income (ideally 28%), adequate cash reserves remaining after closing (at least three to six months of expenses), and a local market where rent is 80% or more of what a comparable ownership payment would be.

The conditions that point toward waiting

Waiting makes sense when the monthly cost of owning stretches your budget past what you'd be comfortable sustaining through a job disruption or unexpected expense. It makes sense when you're likely to move within a few years. It makes sense in markets where prices are still elevated relative to local incomes and rents, and where local employment drivers are uncertain. And it makes sense when buying would leave you with minimal cash reserves, homeownership brings maintenance costs that tenants don't bear, and running dry after a down payment is a precarious position to be in.

Waiting also makes sense if interest rates are likely to fall and you'd be able to refinance into a more sustainable payment. The counterpoint, of course, is that falling rates tend to drive up prices as sidelined demand re-enters the market. Waiting for the perfect convergence of low rates and low prices is a strategy that historically doesn't pay off, those conditions rarely arrive together.

A framework, not a formula

The decision to buy is financial, but it isn't only financial. Stability, space, control over your living environment, and proximity to school districts or family all factor into it. What the numbers can tell you is whether a purchase is sustainable, whether you can absorb the costs without putting yourself in a fragile position. The non-financial factors are yours to weigh.

Run the specific numbers for your situation with the mortgage calculator and the rent vs buy tool. The national median is a reference point, not your decision.